A newer tax regime has been proposed by the Finance Bill, 2020 for Individual and HUF to tax the income of such persons at lower tax rates from F.Y. 2020-21 (A.Y. 2021-22) and onwards, if they agree to forego prescribed deductions and exemptions and fulfill certain conditions as mentioned under the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred as “Act”).
| Taxable Income | Rate of Income Tax |
|---|---|
| Up to Rs. 2,50,000 | Nil |
| From Rs. 2,50,001 to Rs. 5,00,000 | 5% |
| From Rs. 5,00,001 to Rs. 7,50,000 | 10% |
| From Rs. 7,50,001 to Rs. 10,00,000 | 15% |
| From Rs. 10,00,001 to Rs. 12,50,000 | 20% |
| From Rs. 12,50,001 to Rs. 15,00,000 | 25% |
| Above Rs. 15,00,000 | 30% |
Add:
| Surcharge | |
| Range of Income | Rate of Surcharge |
| A.Y. 2021-22 | |
| Rs. 50 Lakhs to Rs. 1 Crore | 10% |
| Rs. 1 Crore to Rs. 2 Crores | 15% |
| Rs. 2 Crores to Rs. 5 Crores | 25% |
| Exceeding Rs. 5 Crores | 37% |
Note: The enhanced surcharge of 25% & 37%, as the case may be, is not levied, from income chargeable to tax under sections 111A, 112A and 115AD (STCG, LTCG, Income of FIIs). Hence, the maximum rate of surcharge on tax payable on such incomes shall be 15%. However, marginal relief is available from surcharge.
Note: A resident individual (whose net income does not exceed Rs. 5,00,000) can avail rebate under section 87A. It is deductible from income-tax before calculating education cess. The amount of rebate is 100 per cent of income-tax or Rs. 12,500, whichever is less.
(a) Any Loss carried forward or unabsorbed depreciation from any earlier assessment years, if such loss or depreciation is attributable to any of the deductions/exemption referred above,
(b) Any Loss under the head "Income from house property" with any other head of income.
| Particulars | Income (Rs) | Old regime (Rs) | New regime (Rs) | Tax Difference (Rs) |
| Salary | 12,50,000 | |||
| Less: Standard deduction | 50,000 | √ | ||
| Less: Professional tax | 2,400 | √ | ||
| Gross total income | 11,97,600 | |||
| Less: Deduction u/s 80C | 1,50,000 | √ | ||
| Total income | 10,47,600 | |||
| Income tax | 1,26,780 | 1,25,000 | ||
| Add: Education cess @ 4% | 5,071 | 5,000 | ||
| Total tax | 1,31,851 | 1,30,000 | 1,851 |
In Example 1, for a salary income of Rs 12,50,000, the new tax regime is marginally beneficial.
However, if assessee claim further deductions for health insurance, investment in NPS, interest on home loan and so on, the existing regime will be helpful.
(√ - Deduction is allowed)
| Particulars | Income (Rs) | Old regime (Rs) | New regime (Rs) | Tax Difference (Rs) |
| Salary | 10,00,000 | |||
| Less: Standard deduction | 50,000 | √ | ||
| Less: Professional tax | 2,400 | √ | ||
| Gross total income | 9,47,600 | |||
| Less: Deduction u/s 80C | 1,50,000 | √ | ||
| Total income | 7,97,600 | |||
| Income tax | 72,020 | 75,000 | ||
| Add: Education cess @ 4% | 2,881 | 3,000 | ||
| Total tax | 74,901 | 78,000 | -3,099 |
In Example 2, for a salary income of Rs 10,00,000, the existing tax regime is beneficial. In case an assessee claims lower deductions for tax savings, towards health insurance, investment in NPS and so on, the current system will be more beneficial.
However, if an individual claims a lower deduction of Rs 1 lakh under section 80C, then the new tax regime will be beneficial. It is important to note that each taxpayer should calculate income tax, taking into account their tax-saving investments and then choose the regime.
Disclaimer: It is suggested that user must cross-check all the facts, calculations, laws and contents of this software help with original Government Publications, Notifications & Circulars.